Forensic Graphology, former Honorary Magistrate. Beyond and above the symbols and mythologies of power trouser, a witness "debunking" on the lapel of careerist "women's liberation." A small poster of ethics of emancipation, which is reported in full in honor of International Women's Day just passed.
"The pants have, for me, only a particular value. Lego empowerment of women mainly to achieve economic independence . I regretted in the past have had to wear clothes from historically male type the suit. I still regret to see our MPs and ministers forced into monastic clothes, hairstyles with short and tidy, plastered inside their trousers, in my pajamas become a prison.
I worked for a time in a law firm in which the highest compliment we could receive was: reasons like a man. We had a label to follow, and dark clothing, preferably trousers. The rationale of the rule was to prevent a customer could be considered unprofessional in a skirt, and this would still be classic and not more than one finger width above the knee. The pants
, read in this light approval with the man, far from being a symbol of emancipation, is bent to the logic of submission . Submission to a system still heavily male.
In the life of your pants every day use, especially soft , in contrast with the long-limbed fashion that it would take all the edge of rickets to be able to "squeeze" into a pair of skinny jeans. Again, the trousers , close to asphyxiation, as well as losing any practicality and be detrimental to the circulation and ovaries bends , once again, the lure male , losing any significance of emancipation .
Personally, when I happen to have an interest or a meeting gallant, or elegant occasions, I wear a nice skirt, not vulgar, not monastic. My emancipation is to pay for dinner and go home in my car without the risk of aggression or violence on the street, and preserve the freedom of not having to go to a second round if the first was not to my expectations.
Many women, among whom I have the honor to be included, despite their wear pants. In a metaphorical sense, of course. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment