On my facebook profile, under "religious orientation", I wrote an atheist. Then I added abbestia atheist. Then, since I was still dissatisfied, I added a simple reflection on the A deprivation, as if, in the language and therefore in the common thought, not believing in God was a deprivation, as if God was a fact and not fiction. Then, rebel (though unnecessarily because they do not manage to transform the language), I wrote that I live in a world where there was not even the word God, because I find the absurd in that right, because I do not no just anything since God does not exist. Can I be amoral in the sense of myself outside of a moral and a socially established and existing, but I can not be an atheist, is a contradiction in terms. It would be more correct to say non-believers, though, as you can see, there is always a constraint to the use of negation.
But I prefer the refusal, and then I say NO, because I prefer to think of believing.
Perhaps most wise and noble would have been to not write anything.
But I enjoy it while we are a bit 'to denounce the horrible word so dear to the men when they talk about who is not on their side or their religion, tolerance.
I do not tolerate shit instead and not even want to be tolerated, more hypocritical is the word that we can use against those who are different from us, the word is far more on dialogue and understanding. It 's a word that lurks through the annulment of the omnipotence of delusional beliefs. Besides the fact that Catholics, for example, actually do not tolerate anything, given the continuous and repeated attacks on the gains of the civil society as the pill, divorce, stem cell research, abortion and so on. Why, in fact, do not limit their diktat on their faithful but also to those who want to impose them is not one of them.
So perhaps it would be better to use the term respect, but already I realize that this is absurd even if, in the historical and cultural conditions, there are beliefs incondivisibili as extermination, to burn, the annulment of women and other unspeakable violence.
I respect a Hitler?
I regret to see that with myself if I follow a consistent thread always arrive the conclusion that there is no real possibility of dialogue with those who have a religious mentality, because a dialogue is impossible. And then, contradicting himself, should I restore the word tolerance.
But I can, I will not tolerate the intrusive and delusions then:
beliefs should remain in private, if you encroach into the public become abnormal.
And so the deprivation it to him to trim them.
(You can see that I have no fucking better to do this morning? "Okay, now I'll write a post more cute)
0 comments:
Post a Comment